<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Just Bloggin'</title>
	<link>http://www.nathanhein.com</link>
	<description>Just another Web designer blogging</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dealing with manufactures with no API for Retailers by Just Bloggin&#8217; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Finally the solution to dealing with manufactures with no API for their retailers</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/01/dealing-with-manufactures-with-no-api-for-retailers/#comment-38</link>
		<author>Just Bloggin&#8217; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Finally the solution to dealing with manufactures with no API for their retailers</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/01/dealing-with-manufactures-with-no-api-for-retailers/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] I eluded to in my previous post (Deal with manufactures with no API for their retailers) frames were going to be the final solution. Not just frames though an iframe. Before I get to deep [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I eluded to in my previous post (Deal with manufactures with no API for their retailers) frames were going to be the final solution. Not just frames though an iframe. Before I get to deep [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jason Fried at MIMA on Unconventional Collaboration by Dereck Meels</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/05/jason-fried-at-mima-on-getting-real/#comment-26</link>
		<author>Dereck Meels</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/05/jason-fried-at-mima-on-getting-real/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Personally I do not agree with many of their statements. Basecamp's not the best tool for project management. It lacks lots of features. Other tools, like Wrike have better functionality. Basecamp guys sometimes concradict their own ideas, as there are features useless for project management in Basecamp. Project management in not only about communication, I'm afraid.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I do not agree with many of their statements. Basecamp&#8217;s not the best tool for project management. It lacks lots of features. Other tools, like Wrike have better functionality. Basecamp guys sometimes concradict their own ideas, as there are features useless for project management in Basecamp. Project management in not only about communication, I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dealing with manufactures with no API for Retailers by BlackPort</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/01/dealing-with-manufactures-with-no-api-for-retailers/#comment-25</link>
		<author>BlackPort</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/01/dealing-with-manufactures-with-no-api-for-retailers/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It could have also been that I read that totally wrong also!
I am not sure about iFrames. I haven't really ventured into that section too much. My thinking lately to make my sites browser resolution OK. Mainly via css / js by resizing it based on their resolution. Not doing it the old way of just making it in 1024 x 768. Just trying to make everything in css.. it seems a bit easier...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could have also been that I read that totally wrong also!<br />
I am not sure about iFrames. I haven&#8217;t really ventured into that section too much. My thinking lately to make my sites browser resolution OK. Mainly via css / js by resizing it based on their resolution. Not doing it the old way of just making it in 1024 x 768. Just trying to make everything in css.. it seems a bit easier&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dealing with manufactures with no API for Retailers by Nathan Hein</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/01/dealing-with-manufactures-with-no-api-for-retailers/#comment-24</link>
		<author>Nathan Hein</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/01/dealing-with-manufactures-with-no-api-for-retailers/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>No the site will not have the traditional "I am Framed" look. I will most likely be using an iFrame over the standard html based frame tags. Not 100% sure though. The SEO value of the vendor pages is not relevant though. I will look into what the major search engines will do but I do not need the clients banner + vendor site indexed together. 

I will post the final result. I guess maybe I jumped the gun on what I was implying I was going to use in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No the site will not have the traditional &#8220;I am Framed&#8221; look. I will most likely be using an iFrame over the standard html based frame tags. Not 100% sure though. The SEO value of the vendor pages is not relevant though. I will look into what the major search engines will do but I do not need the clients banner + vendor site indexed together. </p>
<p>I will post the final result. I guess maybe I jumped the gun on what I was implying I was going to use in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dealing with manufactures with no API for Retailers by BlackPort</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/01/dealing-with-manufactures-with-no-api-for-retailers/#comment-23</link>
		<author>BlackPort</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nathanhein.com/2007/10/01/dealing-with-manufactures-with-no-api-for-retailers/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;FRAMES? Have you lost it? :-P&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As easy as it might be to use them, we all know that they are horrible design wise. If you can pull it off without the page actually looking like it has frames, go for it, but still looks bad in the web design industry and I believe the search engines skip over those sites that use frames. IMO its a bad marketing move, especially for a business web site. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would suggest googling a way to use a frame without actually using a frame and seeing if there is a way to implement a positive outcome for those that are not up-to-date with the API ways. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if I am part of that 2 people who read this.. Yes.. I am going to want to see the result! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PS, yeah I am going to start replying with BPD... its a marketing buff :-D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FRAMES? Have you lost it? <img src='http://www.nathanhein.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As easy as it might be to use them, we all know that they are horrible design wise. If you can pull it off without the page actually looking like it has frames, go for it, but still looks bad in the web design industry and I believe the search engines skip over those sites that use frames. IMO its a bad marketing move, especially for a business web site. </p>
<p>I would suggest googling a way to use a frame without actually using a frame and seeing if there is a way to implement a positive outcome for those that are not up-to-date with the API ways. </p>
<p>And if I am part of that 2 people who read this.. Yes.. I am going to want to see the result! </p>
<p>PS, yeah I am going to start replying with BPD&#8230; its a marketing buff <img src='http://www.nathanhein.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
